Апстракт
At the beginning of the XXI century, as never before, the topic of artificial intelligence has been in the focus of scientific interest. This is due to the galloping pace of information technology and digitalization that the judiciary and law must inevitably follow. Artificial intelligence is a new challenge for court proceedings. This is because using artificial intelligence tools in court proceedings is expected to improve access to justice, increase the speed of court proceedings, and reduce the costs of conducting them. The subject of this paper’s analysis is the various applications of artificial intelligence through which the court procedure can potentially be automated. These are the following applications: an application for the search for the best evidence, an application for the summary analysis of previously made court decisions, an application for the electronic management of court proceedings, a lawyer - robot application, a judge - robot application, an application for the simultaneous resolution of several repetitive actions (lawsuits), an application for simulating court decisions with algorithms, an application for tracking a person while serving a sentence (compass system), an application for examining cases of domestic violence, sexual abuse, and others. By analyzing the applications of artificial intelligence in court proceedings, the authors of this paper want to point out the advantages and weaknesses in the use of artificial intelligence in them. Undeniably, the benefits of artificial intelligence can be used to streamline and reduce the costs of court proceedings without violating any basic human rights or information security breach.
Референци
- Alshami, A. E. (2023). Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review
- Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions. Systems 2023, 11, 351 - 388.
- Ávila Paz de Robledo, R. A. del V. (2023). Digital judicial process and artificial intelligence: New frontiers. Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 130–149.
- Barysė, D. & Sarel, R. (2024). Algorithms in the court: Does it matter which part of the judicial decision - making is automated? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 32, 117–146. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6
- Buchanan, G. B. & Headrick, E. T. (1970). Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanford Law Review, 23, 40 - 62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227753
- European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2018). CEPEJ European ethical charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems and their environment. Council of Europe.
- Gómez Fröde, C. (2020). La tecnología al servicio de la impartición de justicia [Technology at the service of imparting justice]. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal (RIDP), 2(1), 109–140.
- Katz, D. M., Bommarito, J. M., & Blackman, J. (2017). A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PLoS ONE, 12(4), 1–18. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174698 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174698
- Laptev, A. V., & Feyzrakhmanova, R. D. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in justice: Current trends. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-024-00074-2
- Lopes, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making: Evaluating the role of AI in debiasing. TATuP - Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 33(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.33.1.28
- McCarthy, J. (2016). A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on artificial intelligence
- (31 August 1955). In Artificial intelligence: What everyone needs to know. Oxford
- University Press.
- McDonough, K. (2023). ‘World’s first robot lawyer’ hit with lawsuit for practicing without a license.
- LSJ Online.
- Nowotko, M. P. (2021). AI in judicial application of law and the right to a court. Procedia Computer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.235
- Science, 192, 2220–2228.
- Prakken, H. (2018). Komt de robotrechter er aan? [Is the robot judge near?]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 2018(4), 269–274.
- Queudot, M., & Meurs, M. J. (2018). Artificial intelligence and predictive justice: Limitations and perspectives. In Recent trends and future technology in applied intelligence (pp. 889–897). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92058-0_85
- Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92058-0_85
- Seng, D., & Mason, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and evidence. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 33, 241–279.
- Wideroth, F. (2020). The robot as a judge: Dangers, challenges, and opportunities. Uppsala University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1412162/FULLTEXT02.pdf.
Коментари
Сè уште нема коментари. Прашањата и забелешките за трудот се добредојдени.