ABSTRACT
Gender equality constitutes both a fundamental human right and a central pillar of sustainable socio-economic development (Gјorgјioska et al., 2025). Despite notable gains in educational attainment, gender disparities remain pronounced in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), particularly in pathways leading to technical leadership. This study explores the “Southeast European Paradox,” whereby countries such as North Macedonia and Serbia record substantially higher shares of female STEM graduates than the European Union average, yet struggle to retain this talent within the labor market (OECD, 2024).
Adopting a mixed-methods analytical approach, the research interprets these patterns through the theoretical lenses of social identity theory, social constructivism, and feminist institutionalism. The findings point to a persistent “leaky pipeline”: although women in North Macedonia perform strongly in tertiary education, a significant proportion subsequently exit STEM careers. This attrition is closely associated with exclusionary institutional environments, gendered perceptions of technical competence, and limited career progression opportunities. Comparative evidence from neighboring Southeast European contexts further indicates enduring sectoral segregation, with women underrepresented in high-value industrial domains relative to service-oriented sectors.
The study concludes that formally gender-neutral policy frameworks are insufficient to address these structural constraints. Instead, more robust and targeted interventions are required, including institutional accountability mechanisms such as Gender Responsive Budgeting, enforceable organizational quotas, and systematic gender-sensitivity training within educational and professional settings.
REFERENCES
Aalderen-Smeets, S. I. van, & Molen, J. H. W. van der. (2016). Modeling the relation between students’ implicit beliefs about their abilities and their educational STEM choices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9387-7
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
Anglin, A. H., Kincaid, P. A., Short, J. C., & Allen, D. G. (2022). Role Theory Perspectives: Past, Present, and Future Applications of Role Theories in Management Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221081442
Arel, S. K. (2014). Ethnic Identity in Children of Immigrants: Identity Pathways, Academic Outcomes, and the Mediating Effect of Parents and Peers. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108780
Baguant, N. D., Mariaye, H., & Msibi, T. (2023). Gender regimes and gender relations in higher education: The case of a civil engineering course. Transformation in Higher Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v8i0.263
Bairoh, S. (2023). “It is competence first”: executives navigating gender equality targets and meritocracy in technology companies. Gender in Management An International Journal, 39(4), 590. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm-05-2022-0172
Bowman, N. A., Jang, N., & Kim, S. Y. (2022). The effects of female representation in STEM courses on student achievement and persistence. American Educational Research Journal, 59(3), 555–589. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211055412
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. J. (2016). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The Glass Ceiling Effect. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math–Gender Stereotypes in Elementary School Children. Child Development, 82(3), 766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471
Dost, G. (2024). Students’ perspectives on the ‘STEM belonging’ concept at A-level, undergraduate, and postgraduate levels: an examination of gender and ethnicity in student descriptions. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00472-9
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Eccles, J. S. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398185
Eurostat. (2012). In SpringerReference. https://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_205118
Ferati, M., Demukaj, V., Kurti, E., Mörtberg, C., Shahrabi, K., & Mustafa, M. K. (2023). Gender Stereotypes and Women Participation in STEM Fields in the Western Balkans: A Scoping Review [Review of Gender Stereotypes and Women Participation in STEM Fields in the Western Balkans: A Scoping Review]. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(2), 228. Richtmann Publishing. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0044
Figueiredo, D., Rocha, V., & Biscaia, R. (2023). Gender inequality in research productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from STEM fields. Research Policy, 52(1), 104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.10
González-Pérez, S., Martínez, M. M., Paredes, V. R., & Cifré, E. (2022). I am done with this! Women dropping out of engineering majors. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918439
Guo, C., Wu, W., Hu, T., & Gao, T. (2025). Unequal access, equal outcomes? Gender differences in the relationship between university-led STEM program factors and undergraduates’ career commitment in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00569-9
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2
Guthrie, C., Norfolk-Beadle, A., Santos, A. V. P. E., Henderson, K., Rawkins, C., Fordham, E., & Li, R. (2022). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Bulgaria. In OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/57f2fb43-en
Gјorgјioska, E., Janeska, M., Spaseska, T., & Jankuloska, A. R. (2025). Protecting Fundamental Freedoms and Promoting Gender Equality: The Case for Binding Quotas on Macedonian Corporate Boards. https://doi.org/10.47305/jlia.2025.1864
Hamel, E. (2021). Science starts early: A literature review examining the influence of early childhood teachers’ perceptions of gender on teaching practices [Review of Science starts early: A literature review examining the influence of early childhood teachers’ perceptions of gender on teaching practices]. Journal of Childhood Education & Society, 2(3), 267. https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638x.202123118
Leka, E., Lamani, L., & Hoxha, E. (2024). Equity in Bytes: An In-Depth Analysis of Gender Disparities in the ICT Sector Across Albania and Western Balkans Countries - Insights, Challenges, and Strategies for Promoting Inclusion and Empowerment. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem132-71
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
McGuire, L., Hoffman, A. J., Mulvey, K. L., Hartstone‐Rose, A., Winterbottom, M., Joy, A., Law, F., Balkwill, F. R., Burns, K. P., Butler, L., Drews, M., Fields, G., Smith, H., & Rutland, A. (2022). Gender Stereotypes and Peer Selection in STEM Domains Among Children and Adolescents. Sex Roles, 87, 455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01327-9
Lockwood, P. (2006). “Someone like me can be successful”: Do college students need same-gender role models? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00260.x
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en
OECD. (2015). Frascati manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. OECD Publishing.
(OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 Results (Volume III). In Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en
Özdemir, N. K., & As, Y. C. (2022). Career Values and Occupational Aspirations of Adolescents and Their Parents Aspire for the Future of Their Child. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 14, 215. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1126173
European Commission. (2021). She figures 2021: Gender in research and innovation—Statistics and indicators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/06090
Eurostat. (2022). Education and training statistics: Methodology. European Commission.
Reka, F. H., & Memeti, M. (2024). Empowering Diversity: Policies for Gender Equality in Stem Education and Workforce Progression in North Macedonia. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2024-0024
Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
Sjoberg, L. (2023). Interrogating the Image of the ‘21st Century Woman.’ In Routledge eBooks (p. 51). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003281382-5
Tereshchenko, E., Happonen, A., & Hasheela-Mufeti, V. (2023). Barriers for Females to Pursue Stem Careers and Studies at Higher Education Institutions (HEI). A Closer Look at Academic Literature. International Journal of Computer Science & Engineering Survey, 14, 1. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcses.2023.14401
Travers, M., Dwivedi, A., Richardson, I., Crowley, K., & Patten, J. V. (2024). Breaking the bias: perspectives of a WiSTEM2D programme inspiring female undergraduates for a technical future. Education + Training, 66(10), 106. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-02-2023-0033
Utzeri, M. (2019). The dark side of gender equality schemes in management – a deep dive into a german auto manufacturer. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 50(5), 38. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2019.05.04
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2023). UIS methodology for education statistics. UNESCO.
Van Anders, S. M. van. (2004). Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive Barriers to Becoming Professors. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-5461-9
Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. MIT Press.
Verdugo-Castro, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Holgado, A. (2022). Gender gap in STEM education: A systematic review of the main explanations and solutions. Education Sciences, 12(3), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030197
Vilhena, F. C., & Pizarro, J. (2021). Promoting gendered structural change in leadership in higher education. Investigaciones Feministas, 12(2), 319. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.72334
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
World Economic Forum. (2023). Global gender gap report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2023